Legislature(2005 - 2006)
2006-05-03 Senate Journal
Full Journal pdf2006-05-03 Senate Journal Page 3082 SB 261 Message dated May 2 was read, stating the House passed and returned for consideration CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 261(FIN) "An Act relating to the designation of traffic safety corridors; relating to the bail or fine for an offense committed in a traffic safety corridor and to separately accounting for such fines; and providing for an effective date" with the following amendment: HOUSE CS FOR CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 261(JUD) "An Act relating to the designation of traffic safety corridors; relating to the bail or fine for an offense committed in a traffic safety corridor and to separately accounting for such fines; relating to the license point penalty; relating to damage claims regarding a highway work zone; and providing for an effective date" (Title change HCR 44) and with a House Letter of Intent. Senator Huggins moved and asked unanimous consent for the adoption of the House Letter of Intent (House Journal Page 3256). Without objection, the Legislative Letter of Intent was adopted. Senator Gary Stevens moved that the Senate concur in the House amendment. The question being: "Shall the Senate concur in the House amendment?" The roll was taken with the following result: 2006-05-03 Senate Journal Page 3083 HCS CSSB 261(JUD) Shall the Senate Concur in the House Amendment to CSSB 261(FIN)? EFD YEAS: 17 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 3 Yeas: Bunde, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Ellis, Elton, French, Green, Guess, Huggins, Seekins, Stedman, Stevens B, Stevens G, Therriault, Wagoner, Wilken Absent: Hoffman, Kookesh, Olson and so, the Senate concurred in the House amendment, thus adopting HOUSE CS FOR CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 261(JUD) "An Act relating to the designation of traffic safety corridors; relating to the bail or fine for an offense committed in a traffic safety corridor and to separately accounting for such fines; relating to the license point penalty; relating to damage claims regarding a highway work zone; and providing for an effective date." Senator Gary Stevens moved and asked unanimous consent that the vote on concurrence be considered the vote on the effective date clause. Without objection, it was so ordered. The Secretary was requested to notify the House. The bill was referred to the Secretary for enrollment with the Legislative Letter of Intent.